2022 NBA Draft: Jabari Smith Jr. Scouting Article » Discussions

Agents Take Five suggested changes to th

• lovelystyle lovelystyle

  
   

  April 11, 2023

  A work stoppage in 2021, once the current collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the NFL and the NFLPA expires, has seemed inevitable because of Commi sioner Roger Goodell and union executive director DeMaurice Smith's icy relationship. A lack of trust has defined the interactions of the two sides practically since the CBA was ratified in August 2011.Surprisingly, reports of optimism about a new labor agreement being reached before the existing one expires have started surfacing. Preliminary discu sions reportedly have been positive. More NFL The current CBA has been consistently characterized as owner or team friendly. Goodell's broad powers over player discipline Steve Santini Kids Jersey have long been a source for frustration for players. He has been described as judge, jury and executioner in this regard. Although Goodell has gotten plenty of criticism for seemingly applying punishments in an arbitrary manner, focusing on curbing his disciplinary power would be playing into the owners' hands. Areas where the players' side should try to make gains ought to be largely economic.Ideally, franchise and transition designations would be abolished. The franchise tag is a powerful management tool that hinders players from getting fair market value and can depre s salaries. It only directly affects a handful of players annually but the impact on salaries isn't limited to just the recipients. Abolishment simply isn't going to happen in the next CBA. The designations have been in every labor agreement since the 1993 CBA implemented a system for unrestricted free agency. The NFLPA should have bigger priorities that can benefit players economically than the designation system during next round Mirco Mueller Jersey of labor negotiations.Improve revenue splitOwners accomplished their main objective of reducing player costs in the current CBA. This was achieved by lowering the players' share of league revenues to an average of 47 percent during the ten years of the labor agreement. Most importantly, the players are getting 55 percent of league media (radio, television, etc.) with smaller percentage of other revenue streams. The overall split under the 2006 CBA was e sentially 50/50. Getting the percentage up even incrementally would be consequential, particularly from league media, considering the is targeting $25 billion in league revenue by 2027. Revenue was last estimated to be $14 billion. At the very least, pushing for a significant inclusion of new revenue streams, especially from gambling, should be part of the union's equation.Modifying spending minimumsThe CBA requires each team to spend 89 percent of the salary cap in cash over the four year periods of 2013 through 2016 and 2017 through 2020. The league wide spending must be 95 percent of the salary cap in cash during these same periods. These spending minimums were met during the first four year period. Four teams, the , , and , reportedly are under the 89 percent threshold at the halfway mark of the second four-year period.Four years is entirely too long of a timeframe to calculate spending requirements. The period should be reduced to two years, if not annually.A new feature of the current CBA is the ability to carry over unused salary cap room from one league year to the next. This results in each team's actual salary cap (known as adjusted salary cap) differing from the salary cap set by the NFL, which is $188.2 million for the 2019 league year. Ben Lovejoy Kids Jersey Teams rarely carry over le s than the full amount of the surplus. The average adjusted salary cap for teams in the 2018 league year was $188.71 million according to NFLPA data while the league wide figure or unadjusted salary cap was $177.2 million. This fundamental change from previous CBAs has led to some teams annually having an abundance of cap room. For example, the carried over $56.58 million of unused cap room from the 2018 league year after rolling over $50.12 million and $58.91 million of cap space from the 2016 and 2017 league years.Spending shouldn't be based off the league wide salary cap. It should be derived from each team's actual adjusted salary cap.The 95 percent spending minimum works better in theory than in practice. Since it's based off collective league wide spending, the higher spending teams can offset the lower spending ones in order to meet the threshold. It would be more beneficial to the players for each team to be required to reach a league wide spending threshold during the designated timeframe. Some or all of these changes would force more team spending. A byproduct might be the beginning of a return of the incredibly shrinking NFL middle cla s.Elimination of funding rulesContrary to popular belief, guaranteed contracts in and the aren't collectively bargained. Guaranteed contracts became customary in these sports because of individual players exploiting leverage in contract negotiations.The CBA requires that a team must place into an escrow account the amount of any guarantees in a contract other than those just for injury. The archaic funding requirement of guarantees in future contract years made sense in a different era when there were legitimate concerns about owners not being able to fulfill financial Martin Brodeur Women Jersey obligations. That hasn't been the case for quite awhile. Teams use the funding rules as a convenient excuse as why something can't be done in player contract negotiations. I heard it on numerous occasions as an agent when negotiating contracts on behalf of clients. Now that I'm no longer an agent, a couple of team negotiators have told me that their owners have encouraged their use of the funding i sue whenever it suits them.The elimination of the funding requirement may not open the floodgates for guaranteed contracts in the NFL. It might first lead to an increase of guarantees in the later years of the contract. There would be one le s impediment for either of these things since owners wouldn't be tying up money that could be put to other use.Revamp rookie wage scaleSalaries at the top of NFL Draft were drastically reduced with the existing CBA implementing a rookie wage scale. Unproven commodities taken early in the draft were paid like Pro Bowlers Scott Stevens Kids Jersey without playing an NFL game. This was an easy sacrifice for the NFLPA since incoming players aren't considered a part of the union. The latter years of these rookie contracts before the 2011 draft typically became unmanageable for teams when the players were highly productive because of astronomical cap numbers from earning close to the maximum value of a contract through salary escalators and incentives. This phenomenon led to immense leverage for the player where the extremely large cap numbers usually forced a team to re-set a positional market on an extension with a player friendly structure or let him become an unrestricted free agent once his rookie contract expired because use of a franchise tag was impractical. The current system has practically eliminated these occurrences.All contracts for draft choices are

  A work stoppage in 2021, once the current collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the NFL and the NFLPA expires, has seemed inevitable because of Commi sioner Roger Goodell and union executive director DeMaurice Smith's icy relationship. A lack of trust has defined the interactions of the two sides practically since the CBA was ratified in August 2011.Surprisingly, reports of optimism about a new labor agreement being reached before the existing one expires have started surfacing. Preliminary discu sions reportedly have been positive. More NFL The current CBA has been consistently characterized as owner or team friendly. Goodell's broad powers over player discipline Steve Santini Kids Jersey have long been a source for frustration for players. He has been described as judge, jury and executioner in this regard. Although Goodell has gotten plenty of criticism for seemingly applying punishments in an arbitrary manner, focusing on curbing his disciplinary power would be playing into the owners' hands. Areas where the players' side should try to make gains ought to be largely economic.Ideally, franchise and transition designations would be abolished. The franchise tag is a powerful management tool that hinders players from getting fair market value and can depre s salaries. It only directly affects a handful of players annually but the impact on salaries isn't limited to just the recipients. Abolishment simply isn't going to happen in the next CBA. The designations have been in every labor agreement since the 1993 CBA implemented a system for unrestricted free agency. The NFLPA should have bigger priorities that can benefit players economically than the designation system during next round Mirco Mueller Jersey of labor negotiations.Improve revenue splitOwners accomplished their main objective of reducing player costs in the current CBA. This was achieved by lowering the players' share of league revenues to an average of 47 percent during the ten years of the labor agreement. Most importantly, the players are getting 55 percent of league media (radio, television, etc.) with smaller percentage of other revenue streams. The overall split under the 2006 CBA was e sentially 50/50. Getting the percentage up even incrementally would be consequential, particularly from league media, considering the is targeting $25 billion in league revenue by 2027. Revenue was last estimated to be $14 billion. At the very least, pushing for a significant inclusion of new revenue streams, especially from gambling, should be part of the union's equation.Modifying spending minimumsThe CBA requires each team to spend 89 percent of the salary cap in cash over the four year periods of 2013 through 2016 and 2017 through 2020. The league wide spending must be 95 percent of the salary cap in cash during these same periods. These spending minimums were met during the first four year period. Four teams, the , , and , reportedly are under the 89 percent threshold at the halfway mark of the second four-year period.Four years is entirely too long of a timeframe to calculate spending requirements. The period should be reduced to two years, if not annually.A new feature of the current CBA is the ability to carry over unused salary cap room from one league year to the next. This results in each team's actual salary cap (known as adjusted salary cap) differing from the salary cap set by the NFL, which is $188.2 million for the 2019 league year. Ben Lovejoy Kids Jersey Teams rarely carry over le s than the full amount of the surplus. The average adjusted salary cap for teams in the 2018 league year was $188.71 million according to NFLPA data while the league wide figure or unadjusted salary cap was $177.2 million. This fundamental change from previous CBAs has led to some teams annually having an abundance of cap room. For example, the carried over $56.58 million of unused cap room from the 2018 league year after rolling over $50.12 million and $58.91 million of cap space from the 2016 and 2017 league years.Spending shouldn't be based off the league wide salary cap. It should be derived from each team's actual adjusted salary cap.The 95 percent spending minimum works better in theory than in practice. Since it's based off collective league wide spending, the higher spending teams can offset the lower spending ones in order to meet the threshold. It would be more beneficial to the players for each team to be required to reach a league wide spending threshold during the designated timeframe. Some or all of these changes would force more team spending. A byproduct might be the beginning of a return of the incredibly shrinking NFL middle cla s.Elimination of funding rulesContrary to popular belief, guaranteed contracts in and the aren't collectively bargained. Guaranteed contracts became customary in these sports because of individual players exploiting leverage in contract negotiations.The CBA requires that a team must place into an escrow account the amount of any guarantees in a contract other than those just for injury. The archaic funding requirement of guarantees in future contract years made sense in a different era when there were legitimate concerns about owners not being able to fulfill financial Martin Brodeur Women Jersey obligations. That hasn't been the case for quite awhile. Teams use the funding rules as a convenient excuse as why something can't be done in player contract negotiations. I heard it on numerous occasions as an agent when negotiating contracts on behalf of clients. Now that I'm no longer an agent, a couple of team negotiators have told me that their owners have encouraged their use of the funding i sue whenever it suits them.The elimination of the funding requirement may not open the floodgates for guaranteed contracts in the NFL. It might first lead to an increase of guarantees in the later years of the contract. There would be one le s impediment for either of these things since owners wouldn't be tying up money that could be put to other use.Revamp rookie wage scaleSalaries at the top of NFL Draft were drastically reduced with the existing CBA implementing a rookie wage scale. Unproven commodities taken early in the draft were paid like Pro Bowlers Scott Stevens Kids Jersey without playing an NFL game. This was an easy sacrifice for the NFLPA since incoming players aren't considered a part of the union. The latter years of these rookie contracts before the 2011 draft typically became unmanageable for teams when the players were highly productive because of astronomical cap numbers from earning close to the maximum value of a contract through salary escalators and incentives. This phenomenon led to immense leverage for the player where the extremely large cap numbers usually forced a team to re-set a positional market on an extension with a player friendly structure or let him become an unrestricted free agent once his rookie contract expired because use of a franchise tag was impractical. The current system has practically eliminated these occurrences.All contracts for draft choices are